Archive for category Public Policy

RICK PERRY AND RISKY SCIENCE

Posted by on Sunday, 21 August, 2011

 

HEY! IT AIN'T FROM A FETUS.

 

The Governor of Texas just injected himself into a ScienceAintSoBad debate.

Remember The Mystifying Case Of Chloe SohlMove over, Chloe.  Rick Perry (same one as wants to run the United States) just had his own stem cells stuck into his back to “cure” degenerated vertebra.  (Eryn Brown, Los Angeles Times) .

Science.

You can’t live with it. You can’t get it straight.

—————-

Credits for the above image to Robert Scoble and Flickr photostream
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.


YOU Get To Solve The Debt Crisis!

Posted by on Saturday, 6 August, 2011

BUDGET HERO

Looks like a game. Under the covers?  Computer simulation with a friendly face.

YOU CAN’T MAKE IT ANY WORSE!

Congress is a bunch of nitwits, right? You could do better. Here’s yer chance.  I’m not vouching for Budget Hero. MisterScienceAintSoBad doesn’t have time to vet everything he sees. Maybe there’s a built-in bias to make some sneaky point for the Tea Party. Or the Green Party. Or the Whigs.  But you’re bound to get SOME insight from this exercise.


GAY KIDS GOT NOWHERE TO GO

Posted by on Thursday, 28 July, 2011

KIDS DESERVE BETTER

A CRAPPY FACT

Maybe it’s bad to let yourself get too personally involved in the numbers .  Still, MisterScienceAintSoBad’s heart felt sad when he flipped past a report in The American Journal Of Public Health (Heather Corliss) which tells us that one in four teens who “choose” (SURE they do) not to be heterosexual are also “choosing” the street. Gay kids – lots of ‘em – are homeless kids.

You wanna know what I think?

You can guess.

Pathetic.

It says (up at the top) that I make science funny.

Not today.

—————————

(Please don’t think I’m saying the Journal article says that teens “choose” homosexuality. It doesn’t.  But the “choose” thing’s still out there causing  lots of misunderstanding.)

Credits: Thanks to The Italian Voice for the use of the image of a sad young face.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.


Other-worldy Agreements (part II)

Posted by on Saturday, 23 April, 2011

Returning to this planet, our readers didn’t seem to like “Click Here” agreements of the previous blog post any better than Mister ScienceAintSoBad:

THEIR WAY OR HIGHWAY

From TechWheat:
Perhaps, as but one frequent example of the last 35 years, click ahead EULA’s aren’t enforceable or cost effective to enforce. So the companies pushing them at us (before we even get to see if what we’re getting is worth what we paid for it) know this and don’t care as long as we’re not violating their terms in a way that really or measurably hurts them (like public sharing or sale of reproductions of their IP).

A friend of mine was a camp ranger and as a young adult I’d help him open & lockdown the camp between weekends or seasons. There weren’t terribly big latches or locks to secure and it’s not like the buildings had alarms or bars on windows. He always use to say “the locks only keep the “honest people” honest” which may seem a little cynical but really is the way a lot of things work – including things like user agreements for soft-wares. The real pirates won’t care and the mildly tempted are dissuaded……unfortunately we who consider ourselves real honest people & paying customers are treated like the former and have to shrug it off or be left out. What else ya gonna do?
SASB fan,
TechWheat

(Note from me: EULA means End User License Agreement; I looked it up.)

A STANDARD AGREEMENT?

From Dick Pirozzolo :
Sounds like a good campaign issue… maybe a “Standard Software License Agreement” that every company uses. That way lawyers and DAs can pick over one doc and then the companies that make it available could say something like
Check here if you agree with Standard SW contract 47b12.

Same should go for car rentals… who knows what those documents say until your run over someone’s grandma on the Major Degan.

Whatever happened to the handshake?

THEY STINK

DancingWithStars4:
I agree that these agreements stink but there’s nothing we can do about it as individuals. The government needs to get into the action here. Hopefully, congress will take a look.

CORRUPT A MINOR

NoName:
Yes – I have a solution. Get your kid, or your neighbor’s kid to click the check box – or just say they did. Since they can’t enter into a contract legally being a minor, you’re off the hook |-)

IT’S HOPELESS. GET A TYPEWRITER

Anonymous:
Nope, ’cause when they try to eliminate all the legalese and escape clauses and explain in plain English what you have to agree to, it only makes the blah blah blah longer. Plus, what are we supposed to do? If we refuse to sign the blah blah blah then we can’t download or use whatever software, etc. that we need. OK, I guess there is always the typewriter. But try maintaining a blog on that.

FIGHT BACK

Annalee Newitz (Electronic Frontier Foundation) says you gotta watch it. The courts DO enforce these dumb things. She says you may find you’ve agreed not  to share information, not to criticize the company,not to use certain OTHER products, and you may have waived your rights if there’s damage to your computer from the product you installed. You may even be agreeing to all changes in future agreements which are subject to change without notice. (Reminds me of when aspiring Scientologists were, supposedly, required to agree that they believe everything they’re about to be taught.)

Laws do need to be changed and consumers need to get their backs up about these agreements. MISTER ScienceAintSoBad agrees. ScienceAintSoBad Rating (Newitz/EFF article) = 10.

Image credits (once again): Comics at xkcd. SO good. :)

THE DANGER OF CLICKING “I AGREE”

Posted by on Wednesday, 13 April, 2011

(

CLICK ME

CONTRACTS

Remember when signing an agreement used to be a big deal?

You would read it.

And THINK about it.

Maybe pay a lawyer to look at it and scratch out the parts you didn’t like. Argue about the rest?

Try arguing with Sprint about a phone contract. Or with Microsoft about a software license.

The old fashioned contract has morphed into the new fashioned
just-click-this-box-since-you-don’t-have-time-to-read-all-this-drivel-anyway agreement.

Besides. Even if you did have time to read and understand, you couldn’t DO anything about it. So what’s the point?

Is this healthy? Does it make any sense? Would the courts actually enforce these gratuitous “contracts”?

This isn’t  a MISTER ScienceAintSoBad type of issue.

Except it is.

I’m no legal beagle. In fact, I specialize in just one thing. Being  an expert in every single possible aspect of science and technology.

A specialist.

You can see why I can’t add law school to my task list . When would I have time for book signings?

The science/technology angle is obvious here since every new gadget and every software upgrade comes with its own set of incomprehensible documents that we are expected to mindlessly check off before buying or using the product.

Isn’t that silly?

I understand the need to protect  entrepreneurs.

I do.

I even have an agreement (that you’ve never read) at the top of this page. It describes how I get to have your car if you access my blog.

This is getting out of control.

You’re waiting, right? You think I know the answer. Or I’m gonna send you a link.

Fraid not.

I don’t have the answer and I don’t know who does. A plethora of agreements that nobody reads seems to just be a reality of modern life.

I am, however, hoping you have some ideas that’ll help.  Hence, my (very short) questionnaire below.

Please. I’m completely serious. If you, dear reader, can come up with a good solution to the Creeping Agreement Menace, I PROMISE to do everything in my power to pass it to where it’ll do some good.

Your turn:

(I will discuss any responses next time.)